Unlike traditional language models that only respond to prompts, LLM agents act autonomously with almost no human intervention.
The main components, like the LLM brain, reasoning engine, memory modules, and tool integrations, work together under an orchestration framework to create a truly intelligent system.
Through feedback loops and memory retention, agents can reflect on outcomes, correct mistakes, and continuously improve performance.
The architecture can scale depending on the task’s complexity and required collaboration.
LLM agents are being used for enterprise automation, scientific research, and multimodal content generation.
Autonomous AI that makes decisions with almost no human input and still achieves its goals (sometimes even faster than humans) is no longer a sci-fi concept. Countless people encounter so-called AI agents almost every day, whether it’s a client-facing app or a behind-the-scenes process. Thanks to these solutions, many business tasks are done faster, more smoothly, and with almost no drops in quality.
Such a level of autonomy becomes possible thanks to a clear and proven architecture. Without it, no agent could do its job with such accuracy and efficiency. How exactly it works, what it consists of, and what this technology should expect in the future—that's what we are going to discuss in today’s article.
LLM agent architecture is the structural design used to create an autonomous assistant with a language model as its heart. Unlike a standard LLM that just passively answers questions, an agentic system acts more like a project manager. It independently analyzes goals, identifies necessary resources, and completes multi-step plans. The agentic LLM architecture provides the platform that makes this level of autonomous action possible.
This type of software architecture combines intelligent reasoning with actionable workflows. Everything begins when the agent receives a high-level goal from a user. Instead of trying to deal with it in one go, the bot figures out its more manageable parts. Let’s take a look at each step of this process:
Decomposition: The LLM receives a complex goal and deconstructs it into smaller tasks. For example, if you want your agent to write a market analysis report, the first step may sound like “Search for recent industry trends.”
Tool selection: For each task, the planning module determines if it’s necessary to use an external tool. This could be a search engine, a calculator, or a database, depending on what needs to be done. A component called a router often helps choose the right tool for the job.
Action execution: The agent finishes the chosen action with the help of the selected tool.
Observation and learning: The assistant observes the results. Did the search get the right information? Did the code run without errors? This feedback is fed into the memory.
Reflection and re-planning: Depending on the outcome, the agent reflects on its progress. If the prior action was successful, it moves further. If it failed/produced an unexpected result, the agent re-evaluates its strategy and creates a new plan.
And this cycle repeats until the goal is achieved. Thanks to this agent LLM architecture, the system can handle changing situations and fix its own mistakes.
A well-built smart assistant usually includes a bunch of interconnected modules. Each component plays a huge role in how the agent thinks, acts, and learns.
At the heart of every LLM agent is, of course, the LLM itself. This "brain" provides the fundamental reasoning, comprehension, and content generation features. It’s responsible for recognising the user's goal, analyzing problems, and formulating responses. The flexibility and power of the chosen LLM directly impact the bot's intelligence and performance.
This engine upgrades an LLM from a simple chatbot to a true agent. It’s responsible for creating a step-by-step strategy that will help it reach the goal. It analyzes the main objective, identifies the connections between tasks, and decides what to complete first. This component solves challenging problems that require more than one action.
To perform multi-step tasks, an agent needs memory. Memory modules allow AI to keep some information from past actions. This context enables AI to make well-thought-out decisions and learn from its mistakes over time. Without memory, each action will be treated as the first of its kind, without considering any previous results.
An LLM makes your agent smart, memory provides context, and integrations give it hands and feet so it can interact with the outside world. This module connects the LLM with the necessary outside tools like APIs or search engines. By using tools, the smart assistant can complete more complex and elaborate tasks.
An orchestration framework makes sure all modules work together without bottlenecks and delays. It manages the way the LLM core, planning engine, memory, and tools share information. The framework oversees the entire task execution loop, from the prompt to the final result.
Simple tasks don’t need decomposition, but complex requests must be deconstructed. This module takes a high-level goal and divides it into actionable steps. Let’s imagine: You need to create a new marketing campaign. The goal may sound like "Plan a marketing campaign," and it can include steps like "Research competitors," "Define the ICP," and "Write down the content plan."
These solutions define the way agents communicate with users and other systems. These rules control the format of inputs/outputs for the effortless exchange of information. With the help of well-designed communication protocols, agents can update their status and ask for more details when they face something unclear.
If smart assistants want to improve, they should be able to learn. With the help of these loops, artificial intelligence can evaluate the results and change its plans. This can include changing its planning process based on success rate or learning to dodge actions that can lead to errors. As a result, the more tasks the agent completes, the more reliable and accurate it becomes.
These two solutions can be used to complete business tasks, but the ways they function are pretty different. Really different. And the table below shows the most prominent differences:
| Key aspect | Traditional LLM | LLM agent |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomy level | Reactive: Responds to prompts, takes no initiative. | Proactive: Operates autonomously, initiates actions, and makes decisions on its own. |
| Task execution scope | Handles single-turn, information-focused tasks. | Executes multi-step tasks. |
| Memory capabilities | Limited short-term context window. "Memory" is session-based and quickly forgotten. | Dedicated memory modules for persistent knowledge across sessions and long-term context retention. |
| Tool integration | Functions in a closed environment, relies only on pre-existing data. | Integrates with external tools to access real-time information and act. |
| Planning and reasoning | Generates single responses. No explicit planning. | Has advanced planning modules that decompose goals into steps. |
| Learning ability | Static after initial training. | Adopts ongoing learning. |
There are plenty of LLM agent variations that you can choose from. Everything will depend on how complex the task at hand is.
Well, this is the simplest architecture: A single agent works alone and independently to reach its goal. It follows the proven loop of planning, acting, and observing. Such systems are good for many use cases, like personal assistance or content creation.
In a multi-agent system, several agents team up to work on a problem. Each of them should have a specific role/area of expertise. Imagine a system working on a software app. One agent could be the "coder," another the "tester," and a third the "project manager." They communicate with each other and combine their skills to reach the final goal.
This type of architecture introduces a management layer. A "manager" or "controller" agent oversees a team of subordinate agents. The “manager” decomposes the primary goal into smaller ones and puts the appropriate subordinate in charge of it. This structure will work well for managing extremely complicated projects that require high-level strategic oversight.
There are several types of frameworks that engineers can use to build their LLM-based assistants. Each of them is packed with pre-built components and workflows.
Reactive frameworks are the simplest. They just respond directly to the environment without much long-term planning. They work with a simple "if-then" logic, which makes them fast and effective. Tasks that don’t require a lot of thinking will definitely benefit from them.
Deliberative frameworks include explicit steps for planning and thinking. Deliberative agents build an internal model of their world, evaluate what they can do next, and create a plan to achieve the necessary goals. This approach is more resource-intensive, but it helps with more complex and goal-oriented behavior.
These variations are the most advanced, and their goal is to copy human cognition. Frameworks like Soar or ACT-R provide an extensive structure that includes all the parts necessary for the thinking processes. Adding LLMs to it can create smart agents capable of almost human-like problem-solving.
Planning bridges the gap between a goal and the actions you need to achieve it. For agents, this is a must-have feature that plays a crucial role in how effective they are going to be.
At times, an agent can create a complete plan from the start and execute it without deviation. This works well in a fixed environment where all necessary information is available right away. The agent divides the problem, lines up the steps, and completes them one by one.
Unfortunately, in most real-world situations, the environment changes non-stop: An agent might face a bottleneck or discover new information at any moment. In these cases, the ability to re-plan is a must. The agent completes one step of its plan, observes the outcome, and uses that feedback to change or completely rework the rest of its plan. This adaptive planning makes such solutions flexible and adjustable.
These two parts are what make AI agents as powerful as they are. Let’s take a look at why they are so important.
AI agents actively use two types of memory:
Short-term memory: This functions like a scratchpad that keeps the information relevant to the current actions. It usually includes the user's prompt, recent dialog history, and the results of the last few actions. It's a must for saving context during a session.
Long-term memory: This is a constant database where the agent keeps key learnings, user preferences, and productive strategies from the past. Long-term memory improves the agent’s performance without the need to relearn everything from scratch.
A tool can be any resource/program a bot can exploit to perform an action or gather information. The common ones include:
Search engines: For accessing real-time information from the internet.
Code interpreters: For reading code line by line.
APIs: For “talking” to other software, like ticket booking apps, schedule managers, or email services.
Databases: For retrieving structured information.
The practical application of agent-based LLM architecture is already changing the way industries function. Here’s how they do it:
Businesses are deploying smart agents to get some help with complex processes. AI can deal with things like processing invoices, managing support tickets, writing financial reports, and onboarding employees. This frees up the human team to concentrate on more important initiatives.
In science and engineering, smart assistants can speed up research by scouring scientific papers, analyzing industry-specific datasets, and developing hypotheses. They can even design experiments on their own. This application can speed up the pace of scientific innovation.
Smart agents are not limited to just text. Thanks to image generators (like DALL-E) and AI voice solutions, they can become multi-modal systems. Such an agent could take a written concept for a product, generate visual mockups, and create video ads.
Yes, AI agents have great potential, but creating them and making them top-tier comes with its own struggles.
Running an autonomous agent can be tedious and expensive. Improving the architecture, updating the memory, and keeping track of API costs are major challenges for engineers.
Sometimes, LLMs can mistakenly generate incorrect information, or hallucinate. In a smart autonomous system, a hallucination can potentially result in a misleading plan or a wrong action. And that’s why implementing fact-checking mechanisms is a necessary step, especially in situations that include private information.
An independent AI that can do its own things on the internet/within a corporate network sounds cool, but it does bring new threats to businesses, so it's important to build powerful security measures to anticipate these risks. Also, the team must pay a lot of attention to concerns regarding ethics and bias.
LLM agent architectures are changing rapidly. The future points toward even more intricate systems where teams of specialized AIs complete tasks of increasing complexity with the help of joint efforts.
We can also expect tighter integration with the physical world thanks to robotics, so the agents will be able to not only think but also act in our environment. As the language models get more powerful, smart bots will become an ordinary part of our daily life, both professional and personal.
LLM agents are the true future of artificial intelligence in business. These solutions will be most often used to automate tasks and speed up processes. If you want to stay ahead of your competitors and gain a competitive advantage, developing your own intelligent assistant is a smart bet.
Got a project in mind?
Fill in this form or send us an e-mail
Can LLM agents be integrated with existing enterprise software systems?
How does LLM agent architecture handle real-time data processing?
What programming languages are best for implementing LLM agents?
Get weekly updates on the newest design stories, case studies and tips right in your mailbox.